@slimboyfat
It is better to prevent a violent crime in the first place than it is to punish it after it has occurred.
That is correct, but that requires an increase in policing. And it’s impossible to have someone followed around, just in case, some people need to be involuntarily committed to some institution, which is the definition of a prison.
The countries with fewest people in prison are the countries with the lowest rates of violent crime. The countries with the highest number of inmates are the countries with the highest rates of violent crime.
That is incorrect. The US has the highest number of inmates (600/100,000) and has among the lowest rates of crime (381 per 100,000), Scandinavia is the exact opposite with Denmark having one of the lowest inmate populations (72/100k) and one of the highest rates of reported crime in the world (10500/100k). Not only that but the feeling of being unsafe and unreported crime is immensely high in the Scandinavian countries.
The problem with crime statistics in Europe however is that if the perpetrator is not found to be guilty, for much of the property crime the EU does not pursue or report it as a crime. Thus lower sentencing guidelines leads to fewer reported crime, not because it doesn’t happen, but because it doesn’t get reported by the police as being a crime. Similar to how in California, crime rates dropped after they declared stealing less than $950 is not a crime, weird how that works.
Prisons don’t prevent violent crime they make the problem worse.
The stats don’t bear it out, at least not for western countries.